Top 10 Conventional Dry Pit Manufacturers for Water and Wastewater

Introduction

In the modern era of wastewater infrastructure, the shift toward submersible pumping technology has been substantial. However, a significant percentage of municipal lift stations and treatment plants rely on the durability and accessibility of conventional dry pit pumps. Engineers frequently overlook the long-term operational benefits of separating the driver from the hydraulic fluid, particularly in large-capacity applications. A surprising statistic from reliability studies indicates that conventional dry pit motors often achieve a Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) 30% to 50% higher than their submersible counterparts when properly maintained, primarily due to superior air cooling and lower winding temperatures.

This article provides a rigorous technical analysis of the Top 10 Conventional Dry Pit Manufacturers for Water and Wastewater. Unlike general marketing overviews, this guide is structured for the consulting engineer and plant superintendent. We will examine the critical specification criteria, failure modes, and application boundaries that define success in dry well installations. Whether you are retrofitting a 50-year-old station or designing a new 100 MGD headworks, understanding the nuances of these manufacturers and their equipment architecture is essential for ensuring process stability and minimizing lifecycle costs.

Proper selection among the Top 10 Conventional Dry Pit Manufacturers for Water and Wastewater requires navigating a complex landscape of hydraulic efficiencies, solids-handling capabilities, and structural integration. A poor specification—such as selecting a clean-water volute for a raw sewage application or neglecting Net Positive Suction Head Available (NPSHa) margins—can lead to catastrophic cavitation, seal failure, and regulatory violations. This guide aims to equip you with the engineering data necessary to make defensible, high-value decisions.

How to Select / Specify

When specifying equipment from the Top 10 Conventional Dry Pit Manufacturers for Water and Wastewater, the engineering approach must move beyond simple flow and head points. The conventional dry pit configuration—characterized by a pump installed in a dry environment connected to the wet well via suction piping—introduces unique variables regarding alignment, space, and priming that do not exist in submersible applications.

Duty Conditions & Operating Envelope

The operating envelope must be defined by a comprehensive system curve analysis. Engineers must evaluate the intersection of the pump curve not just at the design point, but across the entire range of operation. This includes minimum flow (to prevent thermal buildup and recirculation cavitation) and maximum runout flow (to prevent motor overload and NPSH deficit). In wastewater applications, variable frequency drives (VFDs) are standard; therefore, the selection must account for the static head limitations.

If the static head is high, the turndown ratio of the pump may be limited. Operating a dry pit pump below its minimum stable continuous flow (MCSF) will induce shaft deflection, drastically shortening seal and bearing life. Future capacity considerations are also critical; specifying a pump casing that can accommodate a larger impeller or higher speed in the future allows for capital efficiency as service areas expand.

Materials & Compatibility

Material selection is driven by the fluid characterization. For standard municipal wastewater, cast iron (ASTM A48 Class 30 or 35) volutes are standard. However, for the Top 10 Conventional Dry Pit Manufacturers for Water and Wastewater, engineers should scrutinize the impeller material. Hardened iron or duplex stainless steel impellers are often necessary for grit-laden influent to prevent rapid erosion.

In industrial applications or septic receiving stations, pH shifts can necessitate upgrading the volute to CD4MCu or 316 stainless steel. Furthermore, the wear rings—critical for maintaining hydraulic efficiency—should be specified with a hardness differential (typically 50 Brinell) between the rotating and stationary rings to prevent galling during transient events.

Hydraulics & Process Performance

Hydraulic selection involves balancing efficiency against solids-handling capability. High-efficiency enclosed impellers may offer lower energy costs but pose a clogging risk in raw sewage. Conversely, vortex or recessed impellers offer excellent solids passage but at the cost of lower hydraulic efficiency. For large dry pit pumps, mixed-flow impellers are common.

The specifier must evaluate the Net Positive Suction Head Required (NPSHr) curves carefully. Dry pit installations often have long suction lines with elbows and valves, creating significant friction loss. A safety margin of 1.5 to 2.0 meters (5 to 7 feet) above the NPSHr at the runout point is recommended to account for suction piping degradation and entrained air, which is common in wastewater.

Installation Environment & Constructability

Conventional dry pit pumps require significant floor space. The design must accommodate the pump, the motor (often mounted on a pedestal or elevated stand), and the intermediate shafting. Vertical installations are preferred to save footprint, utilizing universal joint (U-joint) drive shafts to connect the pump to a motor on a higher floor (flood protection).

Constructability reviews must ensure there is overhead crane access for removing the heaviest component (usually the motor or the pump volute). Structural engineers must account for the dynamic loading and torque potential of the assembly, particularly during hard starts. Alignment is critical; unlike close-coupled pumps, long-coupled dry pit units require precise laser alignment to prevent vibration.

Reliability, Redundancy & Failure Modes

The primary failure modes for dry pit pumps differ from submersibles. Mechanical seal failure is the most common issue, often caused by shaft deflection or dry running. Double mechanical seals with a pressurized barrier fluid or seal water flush are standard for critical reliability. Bearing life should be specified at L10 > 100,000 hours.

Redundancy strategies typically follow an N+1 or N+2 philosophy. However, in dry pit stations, the risk of station flooding must be mitigated. If the dry well floods, conventional open drip-proof (ODP) or totally enclosed fan-cooled (TEFC) motors will fail. Specifiers should consider requesting submersible-rated (IP68) motors even for dry pit installations, or strictly enforce the separation of motor and pump via extended shafts to keep the electrics above the flood rim.

Controls & Automation Interfaces

Integration with SCADA is essential for monitoring asset health. Vibration sensors (accelerometers) should be specified on both the pump and motor bearings. RTDs (Resistance Temperature Detectors) in the motor windings and bearings provide early warning of thermal overload. For dry pit pumps, seal leak detection is less straightforward than moisture probes in submersibles; instead, flow switches on seal water lines or level switches in leakage collection reservoirs are used.

Maintainability, Safety & Access

One of the main arguments for using the Top 10 Conventional Dry Pit Manufacturers for Water and Wastewater is maintainability. Operators can access the pump without a crane truck. However, safety is paramount. Guards must cover all rotating shafts and couplings (OSHA compliance). There must be sufficient clearance (typically 36 inches minimum) around the unit for mechanics to work.

Ergonomics play a role in seal replacement. Split mechanical seals are increasingly specified to allow seal replacement without decoupling the motor or dismantling the pump, significantly reducing mean time to repair (MTTR).

Lifecycle Cost Drivers

While the CAPEX for a dry pit station (concrete, HVAC, piping) is higher than a wet well submersible station, the OPEX can be lower due to accessible maintenance and higher motor efficiencies. Standard NEMA motors are generally more efficient and cheaper to rewind than specialized submersible motors. Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) analysis should include energy costs, seal water consumption (if applicable), and the cost of confined space entry procedures required for maintenance.

Comparison Tables

The following tables provide a structured comparison of the leading manufacturers and technology types. Table 1 focuses on the manufacturers themselves, highlighting their specific engineering strengths and typical application ranges. Table 2 provides a decision matrix for applying dry pit technology versus other alternatives based on station characteristics.

Note on Manufacturer Selection: The inclusion of a manufacturer in this “Top 10” list is based on installed base, engineering reputation, and product range specific to conventional dry pit centrifugal pumps. It excludes manufacturers who exclusively produce submersible or self-priming pumps.

Table 1: Top 10 Conventional Dry Pit Manufacturers for Water and Wastewater – Engineering Profile

Manufacturer (Brand Heritage)	Primary Engineering Strengths	Typical Flow / Head Range	Key Considerations / Limitations	Maintenance Profile
1. Flowserve (Worthington)	Heavy-duty volute construction; exceptional hydraulic efficiency for massive flows; robust bearing frames.	>100 MGD / Medium-High Head	High CAPEX; long lead times for custom castings; overkill for small lift stations.	High reliability; parts are proprietary and expensive; designed for decades of service.
2. Xylem (Flygt / Allis Chalmers)	The “AC” series is legendary for non-clog capabilities; extensive hydraulic coverage; strong aftermarket support.	1 – 100+ MGD / Low-High Head	Legacy AC pumps differ from modern Flygt dry-pit submersibles; ensure strict spec compliance for “conventional” types.	Excellent parts availability; huge installed base simplifies finding qualified service technicians.
3. Pentair (Fairbanks Nijhuis)	Specializes in solids handling; broad range of impeller types (enclosed, semi-open, vortex); diverse material options.	0.5 – 75 MGD / Low-Medium Head	Documentation can be complex due to brand consolidation; verify specific manufacturing location.	Standardized designs make routine maintenance straightforward; robust solids handling reduces clogging interventions.
4. Sulzer	Advanced hydraulic design; high-efficiency motors; strong presence in large municipal treatment plants.	2 – 150 MGD / Medium-High Head	European engineering standards may require careful spec review for US-centric projects (flanges/threads).	Sophisticated monitoring options; “Contrablock” hydraulics offer good clog resistance.
5. KSB	German engineering; extremely robust shaft and bearing assemblies; optimized for energy efficiency.	1 – 100 MGD / All Ranges	Similar to Sulzer, watch for metric vs. imperial interface standards; premium pricing.	Long maintenance intervals; mechanical seals are often proprietary but very durable.
6. Cornell Pump	Industry leader in “Cyder-System” cutter pumps and high-efficiency clear water/wastewater hybrids.	0.5 – 20 MGD / High Head capable	Focus is typically on smaller to medium municipal/industrial; less common for massive influent stations.	Double volute designs minimize radial loads; “Redi-Prime” system aids in suction lift applications if needed.
7. Trillium (Wemco)	Famous for the Torque-Flow (Recessed Impeller) and Screw Centrifugal pumps; unbeatable for grit and sludge.	0.2 – 20 MGD / Low-Medium Head	Lower hydraulic efficiency compared to enclosed impellers; not ideal for clean water.	Highest abrasion resistance; massive solids passage; heavy wear components are easy to replace.
8. Peerless (Grundfos)	Strong heritage in split-case and vertical turbine; excellent for clean water and final effluent pumping.	5 – 100+ MGD / High Head	Less focus on raw sewage non-clog compared to others; better for secondary/tertiary treatment.	Split-case design allows bearing/seal access without removing the motor; very operator-friendly.
9. Patterson Pump	Customizable large-volume pumps; often seen in flood control and stormwater applications.	10 – 200+ MGD / Low Head	Large physical footprint; specialized for high-flow/low-head (axial/mixed flow).	Simple, rugged design; requires significant infrastructure for installation (cranes/bases).
10. Hayward Gordon	Specialty hard-metal pumps and choppers; solves extreme clogging or abrasive slurry problems.	0.1 – 15 MGD / High Head	Niche application focus; higher energy consumption due to chopper/vortex designs.	Designed for extreme abuse; hardened parts last longer in grit; reduces unclogging labor.

Table 2: Application Fit Matrix – When to Select Conventional Dry Pit

Scenario / Constraint	Conventional Dry Pit Suitability	Alternative Technology	Engineering Reasoning
Large Raw Sewage (>20 MGD)	Excellent	Vertical Turbine Solids Handling	Dry pit allows easy access to huge bearings and seals. Risk of clogging in VTSH is harder to address.
Flood-Prone Station	Poor (unless modified)	Submersible / Dry-Pit Submersible	Conventional motors fail if flooded. Requires extended shafts to place motors above flood elevation (BFE).
Deep Pump Station (>40 ft)	Moderate	Submersible	Requires long drive shafts (Line Shafting) which introduces vibration and alignment complexity. Submersibles are cheaper here.
High Grit / Abrasion	High	Recessed Impeller (Wemco)	External access allows for frequent wear ring/impeller adjustment to maintain efficiency without lifting the pump.
Limited Plant Staff	Moderate	Submersible (Rail System)	Dry pit requires seal maintenance and greasing. Submersibles are “run to fail/swap” which may suit low-labor utilities.

Engineer & Operator Field Notes

Real-world operation often deviates from the idealized conditions in the catalog. The following notes are compiled from commissioning reports and operator logs regarding the Top 10 Conventional Dry Pit Manufacturers for Water and Wastewater.

Commissioning & Acceptance Testing

The Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) is non-negotiable for large dry pit pumps. Engineers must witness the performance test to verify the head-capacity curve, efficiency, and NPSHr. For dry pit pumps, vibration testing at the factory is critical, but the Site Acceptance Test (SAT) is where validity is proven. The structural stiffness of the site foundation differs from the factory floor.

During SAT, laser alignment of the coupling is the most critical hold point. Thermal growth calculations must be verified—if the pump handles 100°F industrial waste, the cold alignment must account for expansion. Ensure the seal water system (if used) is regulated to the correct pressure (typically 10-15 PSI above stuffing box pressure) before shaft rotation.

Common Specification Mistakes

Common Mistake: Neglecting the Suction Elbow

Placing an elbow directly onto the suction flange of a double-suction split-case or large non-clog pump causes uneven flow distribution into the impeller eye. This leads to bearing vibration and premature failure. Always specify a straight run of at least 5 pipe diameters or use a suction diffuser/flow straightener.

Another frequent error is under-specifying the motor enclosure. In a dry well, high humidity and potential pipe leaks create a corrosive environment. Specifying standard ODP motors is a risk; TEFC with severe duty corrosion protection (IEEE 841 standard equivalent) is the recommended baseline. Additionally, failing to specify a “solids passing capability” (sphere size) that matches the screen openings upstream often results in ragging.

O&M Burden & Strategy

Dry pit pumps require a disciplined Preventive Maintenance (PM) schedule. Unlike submersibles, the bearings are accessible and often require manual regreasing. Over-greasing is as damaging as under-greasing, causing high temperatures and seal blowouts. Automatic greasers are a double-edged sword; they ensure supply but can hide failed seals.

Packing glands, while older technology, are still common in large dry pit pumps. They require regular adjustment to maintain a “cool drip.” If the station is unmanned, mechanical seals are mandatory. For strategy, vibration analysis should be performed quarterly. A rising trend in the 1x RPM spectrum usually indicates imbalance (clogging), while 2x RPM suggests misalignment.

Troubleshooting Guide

Symptom: High Vibration. Check for soft foot (uneven mounting) first. Then, check for air binding in the suction piping high points. Finally, inspect the impeller for partial clogging.

Symptom: Seal Failure. Repeated mechanical seal failure is rarely the seal’s fault. It is usually shaft deflection caused by operating the pump too far left (high flow) or right (shutoff) on the curve, or insufficient seal flush flow allowing grit to score the faces.

Design Details / Calculations

Successful integration of pumps from the Top 10 Conventional Dry Pit Manufacturers for Water and Wastewater relies on precise hydraulic calculations.

Sizing Logic & Methodology

1. Determine Static Head: Accurate survey of wet well low water level vs. discharge point.
2. Calculate Friction Loss: Use Hazen-Williams (C=120 for new ductile iron, C=100 for aged). Include all dry well piping losses.
3. System Curve Generation: Plot Static + Friction at various flows.
4. Pump Selection: Overlay manufacturer curves. Ideally, the Best Efficiency Point (BEP) should be to the right of the primary operating point to allow for wear (which shifts the pump curve left/down) and future flow increases.
5. NPSHa Calculation:
   NPSHa = P_atm + P_static – P_vapor – H_friction
   Ensure NPSHa > NPSHr + 5 ft margin.

Specification Checklist

• Standards: AWWA C700 series (relevant sections), Hydraulic Institute (HI) 1.3 (Rotodynamic Centrifugal Pumps).
• Flanges: ANSI B16.1 Class 125 (standard) or Class 250 (high pressure). Ensure mating piping matches.
• Shafting: For vertical extended shafts, specify Watson-Spicer type cardan shafts or similar to accommodate slight misalignment and building settlement.
• Coatings: Interior ceramic epoxy coating on the volute is highly recommended for wastewater to reduce friction and prevent corrosion.

Standards & Compliance

Municipal specifications typically require adherence to Ten State Standards regarding passing 3-inch solids (for flows > 0.5 MGD). Electrical motors should meet NEMA Premium Efficiency standards. For critical stations, requiring a “Torsional Analysis” of the drive train ensures that the VFD carrier frequencies do not excite natural resonant frequencies of the long shafting system.

FAQ Section

What is the difference between a conventional dry pit pump and a dry-pit submersible?

A conventional dry pit pump uses a standard air-cooled motor (TEFC or ODP) coupled to the pump, often with a separate bearing frame. A dry-pit submersible uses a submersible-rated motor (IP68) integrated directly with the pump, cooled by a glycol or oil jacket. The dry-pit submersible can survive accidental station flooding, whereas the conventional motor generally cannot, though the conventional setup is often easier to repair and more efficient.

How do you select the right shaft sealing system for dry pit pumps?

For raw sewage, cartridge-style mechanical seals with tungsten carbide or silicon carbide faces are standard. If a clean water source is available, a double seal with an external flush is best for reliability. If water is scarce, a single seal with a grease flush or an oil-lubricated seal is preferred. Packing is generally avoided in modern unmanned stations due to the leakage requirement.

Why is NPSH critical in dry pit installations?

Unlike submersibles which are submerged in the fluid (providing positive pressure), dry pit pumps are connected via suction piping. Friction losses in this piping reduce the absolute pressure at the impeller eye. If Net Positive Suction Head Available (NPSHa) drops below Required (NPSHr), cavitation occurs, destroying the impeller and vibrating the pump to failure. Suction lifts are particularly risky and require priming systems.

What are the Top 10 Conventional Dry Pit Manufacturers for Water and Wastewater specifically for grit applications?

While most manufacturers on the list handle sewage, for high grit (abrasive) loads, Trillium (Wemco) and Hayward Gordon are specialized. Pentair (Fairbanks) and Xylem (AC Series) also offer specific hardened material options (Ni-Hard or High Chrome Iron) for their standard non-clog lines to handle grit effectively.

How long should a dry pit pump last?

With proper maintenance, the volute and casting of a conventional dry pit pump can last 30 to 50 years. Rotating assemblies (impeller, shaft, bearings) typically require overhaul every 7 to 15 years depending on service severity. This longevity is a primary reason why engineers continue to specify them for major infrastructure projects over cheaper throw-away alternatives.

What is the cost difference between dry pit and submersible stations?

The equipment cost for dry pit pumps is often comparable to large submersibles. However, the civil construction cost for a dry pit station is typically 40-60% higher because it requires two separate wells (wet and dry) and a superstructure (building). However, the Lifecycle Cost (LCC) can be lower for the dry pit option over 20 years due to lower motor replacement costs and better accessibility.

Conclusion

KEY TAKEAWAYS

• Application Fit: Conventional dry pit pumps are best for large flows (>20 MGD), high-criticality stations, and facilities with dedicated maintenance staff.
• Flooding Risk: Always account for the risk of dry well flooding; separate the motor via extended shafts or ensure adequate sump pump capacity.
• Suction Hydraulics: NPSH margin and correct suction piping design (straight runs) are the most common points of failure in design.
• Top Manufacturers: Flowserve, Xylem (AC), and Sulzer dominate the large municipal space, while Wemco and Hayward Gordon excel in severe abrasive duty.
• Maintenance: Laser alignment and vibration monitoring are mandatory for long-term reliability of coupled units.

Selecting from the Top 10 Conventional Dry Pit Manufacturers for Water and Wastewater is a strategic engineering decision that prioritizes long-term reliability and maintainability over low initial construction cost. While the industry has seen a surge in submersible installations, the conventional dry pit configuration remains the gold standard for massive flow conveyance and critical infrastructure where failure is not an option.

Engineers must rigorously evaluate the specific hydraulic strengths of each manufacturer—whether it is the massive flow capabilities of Flowserve and Peerless, or the solids-handling dominance of Wemco and Pentair. By focusing on the intersection of the system curve with the pump’s preferred operating range, ensuring robust material compatibility, and designing for constructability, utilities can secure an asset that serves effectively for generations. When in doubt, consulting with a hydraulic specialist to perform a torsional and lateral analysis of the proposed drivetrain is a prudent investment in the station’s future performance.

source https://www.waterandwastewater.com/top-10-conventional-dry-pit-manufacturers-for-water-and-wastewater/